Modifications

Published on: March 29, 2023

Wanting to Know More About Discharging Federal Student Loan Debt in a Bankruptcy?

By now everyone (our attorney friends) has probably watched a CLE on the new DOJ Guidance to discharge federal student loans, but do you really understand how to do the process?

We are on a panel set up by the Bransons in Orlando doing an all-day workshop via Zoom on 4/3/23 for the step-by-step process. Including how to draft complaints, serve summons properly, how to fill out the attestation form, what/when to give the DOJ information, and how to get paid. Most likely this will be a $2,500.00 no look per creditor for student loan adversary or you can file a fee application.

I’ll also have a section on other options that are only good for a short period of time when folks have non-Direct federal student loans and an adversary won’t work. This will include the new one time account adjustment under the IDR Waiver, PSLF, the new Repaye calculations which should make an IDR payment roughly 1/3 of what it used to be, BDTR claims are now processing for full forgiveness, the 10k forgiveness appeal and an update on TPD and the payment pause.

Continue reading →

Published on: March 23, 2023

Facing a Foreclosure Filing? Don’t Go it Alone.

By Christie D. Arkovich, P.A.

Supposed a foreclosure lawsuit is filed against you. You file an Answer. The plaintiff files a motion for summary judgment quickly. New civil procedure rules require a homeowner to file his or her defense 20 days before a hearing. Most people are unware of that rule and lose. Even if they show up at the hearing, if they didn’t file their defenses to the MFSJ 20 days prior, they cannot raise any defenses. This is even if they had already filed an Answer when they were initially served. This is only one problem a homeowner could face in a foreclosure proceeding.

“I can’t imagine someone going through it without legal help, because I know how it was for me,” said Philip Jackson, a retired Clearwater police detective who has been involved in a long-running legal fight with St. Petersburg stemming from a foreclosure lawsuit the city brought against him in 2019.

Published on: November 21, 2022

Surprise surprise — The Exit from Forbearance Can Get Messy!

By Christie D. Arkovich, P.A.

While it took longer than I and many other consumer advocates thought, the house of cards is starting to slip finally. Many mortgage companies did not fully disclose exactly what would be required once the CARES Act expired and mortgage payments would resume. I’m sure many homeowners have claims out there but don’t realize it. These consumer claims are no small thing and can be leveraged for better mortgage terms than what is being offered. The CFPB is going after Carrington with a big fine — but a private action will result in actual damages for the homeowner.

CFPB Takes Action Against Carrington Mortgage for Cheating Homeowners out of CARES Act Rights

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) is taking action against Carrington Mortgage Services for deceptive acts or practices under the Consumer Financial Protection Act in connection with mortgage forbearances, according to a CFPB press release. The CFPB found that Carrington failed to implement many protections, provided to borrowers with federally backed mortgage loans who were experiencing financial hardship, during the COVID-19 public health emergency. The CFPB found that Carrington misled certain homeowners who had sought a forbearance under the CARES Act into paying improper late fees, deceived consumers about forbearance and repayment options, and inaccurately reported the forbearance status of borrowers to the big three credit-reporting companies: Equifax, Experian and TransUnion. The CFPB is ordering Carrington to repay any late fees not already refunded, repair its faulty business practices, and pay a $5.25 million penalty that will be deposited into the CFPB’s victims relief fund.

Continue reading →

Published on: July 15, 2021

New Rules to Help Those with Student Loan Debt Qualify for a Mortgage

By Christie D. Arkovich, P.A.

Are you looking to buy a house now? Waiting could cost you as inflationary pressures will likely cause your dollar to decline. Moreover, interest rates will begin to rise in 2022 – 2023 as the Fed begins to normalize the interest rate. If you have student loan debt that has prevented you in the past from buying a home, keep reading…

In light of this, mortgages and refinances are a very popular topic now — especially among those with student loan debt. One big hang up was just resolved. Previously, a mortgage lender had to use 1% of the outstanding loan balance, even when a borrower was in IDR and the monthly payment reported on the Borrower’s credit report was zero.

We would suggest a temporary fix: the borrower would exit IDR for a month or two where the payment may have been zero, make a fixed standard or extended payment, apply for the mortgage and after approval, get back into the IDR. This wasn’t the best fix; however, as it unnecessarily caused a student loan borrower to have the loan capitalize the unpaid interest. But it did let someone buy a house who otherwise could not.

Continue reading →

Published on: April 8, 2021

What to Expect When Mortgage Forbearance Ends?

By Christie D. Arkovich, P.A.

The CFPB stated today “[w]e are at really an unusual point in history. I don’t think anybody has ever before seen this many mortgages in forbearance at one time that are expected to exit forbearance all at one time.”

No kidding. This may be the calm before the storm type of thing if mortgage servicers don’t get it right when all these forbearances end.

Living in Florida sometimes it seems like the pandemic is firmly in our rearview. While we are still working from home, it’s mostly because we want to be part of the solution, and can get our work done with our cloud server. But people are out and about pretty regularly now.

Continue reading →

Published on: December 17, 2020

Highlights of the New Consumer Bankruptcy Reform Bill Under Review

By Christie D. Arkovich, P.A.

Today the American Bar Institute (ABI) Consumer Bankruptcy Committee presented an excellent webinar about the new bankruptcy bill pending in the House. Basically, the House would eliminate the existing Chapter 7 and 13, and replace them with a new Chapter 10 under the Consumer Bankruptcy Reform Act of 2020.

While this is a major overhaul and expectations are low that it would pass as is, there is a good possibility that many of the points within may be included in various stimulus bills and are important to note for the future. I am not expressing an opinion for or against any of these items. I’ve included a short summary below:

The first goal was to streamline the process and make it cheaper:

Continue reading →

Published on: September 15, 2017

Hurricane Irma – What to Do If You Cannot Afford to Make Your Mortgage or Student Loan Payments?

By Christie D. Arkovich, P.A.

Hurricane Irma has caused an interruption in income for many people in Florida and elsewhere. This information may be helpful for those who cannot make their mortgage or student loan payment when due:

For those in a rehab agreement on federal student loans to avoid wage garnishment:

Payments to Rehabilitate Defaulted Loans (§674.39). During the time a borrower is affected by a disaster, an institution should not treat any scheduled payment the borrower fails to make as a missed payment in the stream of nine on-time, consecutive, monthly payments required for the borrower to rehabilitate the defaulted loan. When the borrower is no longer affected by the disaster, the required sequence of qualifying payments may resume at the point at which it was discontinued.

Continue reading →

Published on: March 16, 2017

How to Keep Your Home When Your Loan Mod is Denied: File Chapter 13 Bankruptcy.

By Christie D. Arkovich, P.A.

With the property market continuing to improve in Florida, we are seeing more lenders delay and place obstacles in front of borrowers trying to modify their home mortgage in an effort to keep their homes. There are certain court rules and CFPB rules regarding modification that an attorney may be able to help ensure that the lender properly reviews a loan mod package. When that fails, an appeal or online complaint to the CFPB may help. When that fails, a very good way to make a lender accept your mortgage payments, is to file a Chapter 13.

First there is a modification process available in many bankruptcy courts, including the Middle District Tampa Division that works pretty well. There is a good faith requirement that does not exist in state court. So some mods that may be denied outside of court, or in the state court, may actually be approved in a Chapter 13.

A relatively foolproof way to keep a home is also to use a Chapter 13 plan to catch up on the missed payments. This may be really good for a borrower who had a prior loan modification (with principal reduction) that they fell behind. A Chapter 13 should be able to revive the terms of the favorable loan mod. The catch is that the total arrearage (missed payments, and any foreclosure fees/costs) must be paid within no more than five years, while at the same time the regular monthly payment is also made. A mortgage company cannot object to a plan like this that provides “adequate protection” to the lender. Many people cannot afford this, but an easy way to see if you can is to check your last mortgage statement for the balance due (not the principal amount). If it says $20,000, then divide $20,000 by 60 months which is $333. So if your mortgage payment is $1,500, you would add $333 to catch up and another 10% for the trustee’s fee for a monthly total of $1,983. If you can afford this, then your mortgage company must accept it — even though they may really want to foreclose.

Continue reading →

Published on: November 21, 2016

Hamp Loan Mod Expiration Dec 2016 and What It Means for Homeowners

By Christie D. Arkovich, P.A.

One item not getting a lot of press but it probably should is the expiration of the Treasury Department’s Making Homes Affordable MHA HAMP program on December 30, 2016. More info can be found here. The good news is that the deadline won’t cancel any pending mod applications.

The general deadline for HAMP is that a borrower must submit an initial application by Dec. 30; and then the mod effective date must be by Sept. 1, 2017 (which means the trial plan would have to start no later than June 2017, if you work backwards – so it will be important to keep the pressure on servicers to get those applications completed and evaluated timely).

For Streamline HAMPs, the borrower is not required to submit an initial package, however, the modification effective date must be on or before December 1, 2017 (includes all of next year). Notwithstanding the foregoing, to be considered for a Streamline HAMP Offer after December 30, 2016, the borrower must have submitted at least one component of a Loss Mitigation Application on or before December 30, 2016 for which the servicer has not sent a Non-Approval Notice. The Modification Effective Date of the loan must be on or before December 1, 2017. Evidence of borrower submission must be provided by postmark or other independent indicator such as date and time stamp (electronic or otherwise).

Continue reading →

Published on: April 4, 2016

Common Mortgage Problems Following a Chapter 7 with No Reaffirmation of the Mortgage

By Christie D. Arkovich, P.A.

Consumer debtors routinely have various related difficulties with mortgages following the filing of a Chapter 7 bankruptcy. Unfortunately, the first thought is that the bankruptcy attorney messed up when that really is not the case. They think the attorney put the home into the bankruptcy when it was meant to be left out. However, all debt and assets must be listed and included for disclosure purpose in a bankruptcy. Debtors who want to keep their home, have a choice to reaffirm the debt by signing a Reaffirmation Agreement or by simply continuing to make monthly payments. In most cases, it is advantageous for a debtor not to reaffirm a mortgage debt, but rather just continue to maintain payments, particularly when the home is under water and no equity exists in the property. If they reaffirmed the debt and eventually had to give up the house because they moved to take another job for instance, they would be back on the hook for the mortgage debt.

So what kind of problems come up when a debtor does not formally reaffirm the debt in bankruptcy, but their intention is to keep the property and continue making payments:

Whether or not a reaffirmation of a mortgage is required

Continue reading →