Published on:

christie_d._arkovich_p.a_1_small Unfortunately, student loan borrowers in default on federal loans are experiencing tax intercepts around this time of year, sometimes for the first time ever.  Some tips:  1) if we can cure the default before your taxes are filed and the intercept occurs, we can stop it from ever happening; 2) if you can’t cure the default, there is a 20 day period to request a hearing, but ultimately unless you are completely destitute they will be able to keep your tax refund.  We recommend that if you know this is coming, delay filing your tax return and request an extension until you can cure the default.

Curing a default in federal student loans does not mean you have to bring it current and pay all missed payments.  Instead what we do for clients is negotiate a rehabilitation plan or sometimes a consolidation of certain loans to cure the default.  Often the payments to rehab a loan are as little as $5 and it does take into account your income and expenses.  We have a very thorough budget we like to use in negotiations so the debt collector can see what your true disposable income is.

You can also stop a tax intercept by filing bankruptcy.  If you have have enough personal property exemptions, you would be able to keep a portion or the entire tax refund.  Filing a bankruptcy petition before the offset activates causes the automatic stay to stop all collections even those initiated by the federal government.

Published on:

telephone

Communications with a homeowner when a debt collector is aware that the homeowner is represented by counsel is a violation of the FDCPA.  15 U.S.C. 1692c(a)(2).  This includes any mortgage servicer who has acquired a defaulted mortgage loan.  It is also a violation of our Florida Consumer Collection Practices Act (“FCCPA”).

Furthermore, if the mortgage servicer is calling you constantly, take a moment and take one of their calls:  tell them to stop calling your cell phone.  This invokes protection under the TCPA (Telephone Consumer Protection Act).  This protection from continued cell phone harassment can result in significant statutory damages of $500-$1500 per call.

Our Tampa, Florida law office, Arkovich Law, pursues violations of the FDCPA, FCCPA and TCPA for our clients who are delinquent in their mortgage or who have debt that is no longer enforceable such as when the statute of limitations has expired or a bankruptcy is filed.

Published on:

While not a Florida case, the Fourth Circuit ruled today that the arbitration provision of Western Sky Payday Loans is unenforceable.  This may be a sign of expanding consumer protections in the future, although it is very early to tell.  Mandatory arbitration clauses force a consumer to give up their right to go to court, participate in a class action, pay expensive filing fees of sometimes thousands of dollars, pay an arbitrator $300-$400 a hour (a Judge is free!) as well as other drawbacks.

Quick summary of the highlights:

  • No one appears to seriously dispute that Western Sky’s payday loans violated a host of state and federal lending laws. Indeed, a quick glance at Western Sky’s loan agreement suggests that Western Sky was keenly aware of the dubious nature of its trade.
Published on:

Phone-Police-150x150

Last week on January 20, 2016, in Campbell-Ewald Co. v. Gomez, ___ U.S. ___, 2016 WL 22835 (Jan. 20, 2016), the Supreme Court issued several important rulings in a TCPA class action.  These rulings will help consumers in cases where they are receiving unwanted text messages; being contacted by various parties seeking to collect a debt and debt collection by federal contractors.

  • “A text message to a cellular telephone … qualifies as a “call” within the compass of” the TCPA’s prohibition against autodialed or prerecorded calls to cell phones without the consumer’s prior express consent.
  • A defendant can be liable for another’s TCPA violations based on common law principles of agency.
Published on:

The FTC guidelines state that credit reports can include debts discharged in bankruptcy so long as they’re reported as discharged with a zero balance. 16 C.F.R. 600 app. § 607(b)(6). See also Schueller 559 Fed.Appx. at 737; Horsch, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37476, 2015 WL 1344836, at *10. The only guidance on this at all close comes from the Federal Trade Commission regulation. It states, “A consumer report may include an account that was discharged in bankruptcy (as well as the bankruptcy itself), as long as it reports a zero balance due to reflect the fact that the consumer is no longer liable for the discharged debt.” 16 C.F.R. 600 app. 607(b)(6)(2010).

For more information about how a bankruptcy filing will affect you, please contact us at Arkovich Law

Published on:

loan mod2
We are still doing loan mods for our clients – three alone this week – one in a Chapter 13 bankruptcy and two outside of bankruptcy.  One has the docs to sign, another was presented with options including a principal reduction, and the other should be finished with underwriting and accepted in less than 30 days.

The June 2015 MHA Handbook Ver.4.5, revised on January 6, 2015 to Ver. 5.0, covers some of the procedures to be followed for borrowers who have filed bankruptcy and are seeking a loan mod to keep their home:

8.5 Borrower in Bankruptcy Borrowers who are currently in a TPP and subsequently file for bankruptcy may not be denied a permanent modification on the basis of the bankruptcy filing. The servicer and its counsel must work with the borrower or borrower’s counsel to obtain any court and/or trustee approvals required in accordance with local court rules and procedures. Servicers should extend the TPP as necessary to accommodate delays in obtaining court approvals or receiving a full remittance of the borrower’s trial period payments when they are made to a trustee, but they are not required to extend the trial period beyond two months, resulting in a total five-month trial period. In the event of a trial period extension, the borrower shall make a trial period payment for each month of the trial period including any extension month.

Published on:

past due

Bankruptcy is supposed to provide a fresh start.  A reprieve from debt collector letters, calls, statements, threatening legal correspondence etc.  A do over.

Many mortgage servicers have believed they were exempt from this – after all they are merely servicing and protecting a mortgage lien they argue.  They’ve argued that federal laws require they send you all this stuff.  And call you multiple times in one day, every day.  This is not true.  Due to recent federal and state court rulings in Florida, mortgage servicers must stop mailing and calling you when you’ve told them not to, or filed bankruptcy and given up the home.  One local federal case brought in the Tampa Division, Florida, Elissa Diane LaPointe v. Bank of America, N.A., Case No.: 8:15-cv-1402-T-26EAJ (August 26, 2015) even ruled that the disclaimers often found in the small print in footnotes would not be enough to insulate mortgage servicers from liability.  The Court particularly noted the inconspicuous tiny print disclaimers are contradicted by the much more obvious demands for payment or statements of a past due amount.  The Court ruled that the consumer stated a claim under the FCCPA in three respects:  1) the bank’s communications could reasonably be expected to harass the consumer; 2) that they were an attempt to collect a debt that was no longer owed due to the bankruptcy; and 3) the consumers were contacted when they were represented by an attorney.

We’d like to pursue these contacts for what they are:  debt collection violations.  If you’ve ever told a mortgage company to stop calling you, we’d like to know about it.  If you are continuing to receive all kinds of correspondence or statements from mortgage companies after you’ve given up a home in bankruptcy, we’d like to know about it (particularly when those notices contain requests or demands for payment).  Most likely, their continued calls and the sending of statements are unlawful and you are entitled to statutory damages.  We have no fees or costs unless there is a recovery.   Contact Arkovich Law for further information.

Published on:

Tax breaks
We’ve had some of Tampa Bay Florida clients ask us what the forgiveness act means to them and if it applies to them and I thought the following summary may help others as well:

This legislation that was just signed into law and good through the end of 2016 now applies to cancellation of debt on the borrower’s  principal residence –

Some brief info from the IRS website:

Published on:

christie_d._arkovich_p.a_1_smallWith the Education Department’s new regulation last month on its Revised Pay As You Earn Plan, or REPAYE, all Direct Loan borrowers can access an income-based repayment plan that caps payments at 10 percent of their income, according to Undersecretary Ted Mitchell.

“This is a quilt – that had one piece missing – made up of the various income driven repayment plans,” Mitchell said. “We’ve now stitched that last piece of the quilt in and the quilt now covers all Direct Loan borrowers.”

Five million additional borrowers, including those who weren’t previously eligible because their debts were older, can now enroll starting in December.

Published on:

credit rating arrows
Did you ever wonder why certain items appear on your credit report?  The answer lies in a federal statute, 15 U.S.C. 1681c.  A consumer reporting agency may not make a report that includes the following items.  I’ve bolded some of the more pertinent items that affect our Tampa Bay area Florida clients.  Not all creditors report, but when they do, they are supposed to provide an accurate report.  Remember whenever settling debt, there are ways to get the debt removed from your credit.

First if they report, we can ask in the negotiations for a trade line deletion. Then all the late pays and the fact the debt was settled for less than what is owed will not be reported any longer.  Second, if the debt buyer we are trying to settle with does not report, then we can obtain proof of payment/settlement and our client can then dispute the item.  The credit bureaus will return to the original reporting creditor for validation and they will not be able to validate that the debt remains unpaid.  Both options will clear the debt from our client’s credit which can help them qualify for a home or a better interest rate on a car for instance.

“(1) Cases under title 11 or under the Bankruptcy Act that, from the date of entry of the order for relief or the date of adjudication, as the case may be, antedate the report by more than 10 years.

Contact Information